This forum is for users to exchange information and discuss with other users about a TMPGEnc product.
In case you need official support, please contact TMPG Inc.
Pegasys Products BBS [ Sorted by thread creation date ]
I have a file that was originally 25fps. As it changed hands, someone re-encoded it to 29.97 but it's still sped up.
I'd like to alter the original specs for the file to set it at 25fps but both the FPS and "analyze" are greyed out. I know that, in the past, there was an option to manipulate both of those but now it's gone. Is it just this particular file? Should I be doing something different with it?
Please advise! :(
Since encoding can take many hours (especially with advanced filters and slow PC's) I'd love the option to pause an encode and resume even after a shutdown.
I agree... the best upgrade to my motherboard & CPU that I can buy is $150-175, and I live on a fixed income. I recently purchase this software, and the need for this should have been incorporated into the product long time ago.
Hi. I have been creating Blu-Ray discs (BDs), with Authoring Works 5, for about 3 1/2 years now and the program is just irreplaceable, at least for me. My PC includes an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 910 Processor, 2600 Mhz, Quad Core. Even at 2.6 GHz, the processor "pegs out" at 100% use during the entire rendering procedure and can take up to 9 hours to complete. I use AW5's stream format of MPEG-4 AVC. The source files are captured at 12 Mb/s, in TS mode. My minimum render speed is 13 Mb/s, but if higher speed renders will fit onto the rendered files, I'll bump that up to whatever I can fit (some sports as high as 24 Mb/s). My question is, would a higher speed CPU processor help? I see that Asus's processors can be upgraded to 5 GHz/s, although some say that, to get that speed, the whole motherboard needs to be replaced. My wish is that I could have a higher speed processor installed, which would result in the BD rendering using only part of the processor capacity; say, 75%, or even lower, if possible. Do you have any experience with these issues and can help me? Thanks a lot. Russell
A faster, better CPU will always help. You can try to lower the task priority to make your PC run smoother while encoding. If you want to manually limit the CPU usage for Authoring Works only, I suggest you check you the excellent Process Lasso.
I have tried the sharpen filters but they seem to lighten (brightness) the image. Does anyone recommend any settings that will not cause the image to brighten?
I tried the smart sharp & contour filters using their default settings and did not see any sharpening effect occur. Do you have any settings you might recommend?
You have to play around with the settings as the default settings may be too weak. The settings will depend on your video footage and your own preferences.
It seems even thought the exact same sharpener filters have been around since i think the very first version of xpress, im shocked they havent added different sharpener filters to the mix. At the moment all i see are filters that contour and thats it which as you have said only brighten up edges and there not that good.
Can "Nero 2014 Burning Rom" software Be used to burn valid (playable Blu-Ray disk from the output of AW5? The burning tool that comes with AW5 leaves a bit to be desired...
Yes, TAW5 output can be burnt just fine using Nero. I prefer to do this, rather than burn directly from inside TAW5, because you can then get Nero to do things like verifying the burn against the original folders, or using multiple burnere to create several copies simultaneously.
I've had success creating a new (empty) BDMV project within Nero, then dragging the TAW5 output folders into it, and burning either to BD or an ISO file direct from Nero.
Nero also works just fine with BD ISOs created from DVDFab. Sometimes I'll use DVDFab to create an ISO from the TAW5 output folders, then use Nero to burn that to disc.
I'm new to Authoring Works (5) and would like to create a blu ray disc from my uncompressed progressive AVI files at 29.97. I would like to encode with progressive sequential frames, not 1080i. Everything I try ends up as 1080i at 29.97 fps.
I've tried:
1) Output from Mastering Works as 29.97i upper field first BDMV AVC, then choose the 2:2 pulldown option. Still end up with 1080i.
2) Import AVI directly into Authoring Works and allow it to do the encode. As my file is progressive, I had to choose that upon import. Still got 1080i.
I think I even tried importing the AVI as interlaced (even though it's not) and ended up with 1080i.
Anyone know how to make a PSF blu ray with these programs from a 29.97 fps file?
Are you changing the track settings, or are you changing the clip settings?
Changing the clip settings will not determine the output settings; clip settings are for setting what the input file should be BEFORE encoding (in case the header file info is wrong, for instance).
In order to change the actual output settings, you have to do that in the track settings. You can do this by going to the Source stage and clicking on the "Settings" button for a track on the left side of the screen. Each track can have its own output settings. This is where you can set the resolution, framerate, etc.
hmmm ...FREEWARE(!) software HandBrake in new version:
"H.265 encoder
is now available through x265 1.4."
...hmm ...and pay software TMPGenc Video Mastering Works still nothing:-(
I reckon it's not that simple for them to support new formats (like x264 10bit which is long overdue) because they also have to adjust/make compatible their list of included filters. Just a guess though - an official reply or public communication channel would be nice.
In a menu with a single track and multiple chapters: all chapters have "back to menu" defined as end action, and General "play the next track (disc loop playback)" defined as track playback end action.
The result is that, when an individual chapter was selected in the menu, the menu is displayed at the end of the chapter, except for the last one, where the track playback end action takes precedence and playback resumes from the first chapter automatically instead of displaying the menu.
Is there a way to accomplish the following:
- Always display the track menu at the end of every chapter, when an individual chapter was selected in the menu, and
- Loop the disc (all chapters) ONLY IF the "play track" button was selected ?
Oh and BTW, is there a way to have some kind of "play track" button which would loop only SOME OF the chapters displayed in the track menu ?
Or how should I arrange tracks / chapters to achieve the same effect (i.e. ability to play [one single clip / loop a subset of all clips / loop all clips] using different buttons ?), knowing that the project consists of individual unrelated clips, so I have full freedom to arrange them in one or multiple tracks, and each clip has only one entry point (chapter), but I would prefer to have all clips (chapters) accessible from a single menu page.
Nvidia has disabled all CUDA functions in the latest drivers. They are trying to push NVENC now. We need to wait for the software to be updated to use this feature. For now your best bet is to roll back your drivers to an earlier version when CUDA was still enabled.
I'm using a GTX670 with GEForce drivers v344.75 (18-Nov-2014).
The option to enable CUDA is available in TAW5 and all my other CUDA-enabled applications. TAW5 shows it is being used (right now, CPU 3.0%, CUDFA 97.0%). I can also see the GPU and Video ENgline loadings in GPU-Z. So it looks like support has been reinstated in a recent driver.
Just updated to version 353.30 for my GeForce 650. CUDA comes with this version also. So i have no problems activating and using CUDA in both TAW5 and TVMW5.
TVMW5 even asked me if i wanted to use it, when i loaded the software.
Sometimes after burning video movies and watching them on my television, I find that the overall volume is too low. I have to turn the volume all the way up and am still not able to hear some of the most quiet dialog. However, the sound effects at certain suspenseful points, are way too loud.
Using the Volume Adjustment feature of TMPGEnc Authoring Works 5, I'd like to increase the volume overall and tone down the special effects a bit. Which feature of the Volume Adjustment would I use: the Volume Adjustment, the Volume Normalization, or the Volume Uniformization. How would I make the required settings is the preferred option.
I'm using the GPU NVIDIA GTX 760 but when i activate NVIDIA CUDA 2.0 it announced that
An error occurred during CUDA execution [cudaError...]
Can somebody help me with this because i bought the new gpu just to encode video