TMPGEnc 2.5 (Free or plus version) BBS

Jump to forum:

This forum is for users to exchange information and discuss with other users about a TMPGEnc product.
In case you need official support, please contact TMPG Inc.


TMPGEnc 2.5 (Free or plus version) BBS [ Sorted by thread creation date ] << < Prev.   [ 616 / 680 ]   Next > >>
Classify Title User name Reply Last update
Question SVCD quality question ? Dennis 2 2002-04-22 20:22:04
Question SVCD from 23,976 DivX is snatchy... Q 6 2002-04-22 19:51:37
Free talk Techno's statements are making this forum RIDICULOUS ! gdj 23 2002-04-23 08:47:54
Question LSX MPEG ENCODER MannaZen1 2 2002-04-22 21:37:51
Question VCD/SVCD Quality on TV MannaZen1 3 2002-04-22 21:19:18
Question can I speed up my avi when making an mpeg? Joy 4 2002-04-23 00:10:44
Question JPEGS to MPEGs + Audio Craig 0 2002-04-22 02:33:52
Question Cutting File Size Adam 1 2002-04-22 06:46:08
Request Watermarking an MPG PB 2 2002-05-13 12:21:48
Question Cutting File Size Adam 4 2002-04-22 22:27:51
Question ac3 sound on an avi madns 1 2002-04-22 07:53:41
Question Converting - Aftermath Problems Burnproof 3 2002-04-22 19:54:30

TMPGEnc 2.5 (Free or plus version) BBS [ Sorted by thread creation date ] << < Prev.   [ 616 / 680 ]   Next > >>
Question - SVCD quality question ? No.19638
Dennis  Home )  2002-04-22 13:29:01 ( ID:.uhbhxbi0ng )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Hi.

Is there anyway of increasing the quality of SVCD standard ? Dose tmpgenc provide all settings and can they be tweeket to maximum ?

Since Cinemacraft Encoder SP costs a lot of money and isn't stable on my system (the version I tried).

I keep hering from people that cinemacraft bla bla bla is the best and so on, it's faster etc.

I was just thinking if there is anyway of getting the quality up on SVCD or do you need like 5-pass stuff for that ? I don't care if encoding take a lot of time I want maximum quality.

/Regards Dennis


M.Bastian  2002-04-22 18:51:18 ( ID:lh1udvptj1c )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Regarding CInemacraft: You might want to read Ashy's reply in this thread:
http://www.tmpgenc.net/cgi-bin/ebbs/board.cgi?board=tmpgenc&cmd=topic&wparam=2861



xfilze  2002-04-22 20:22:04 ( ID:s00.avcw8/f )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

i have made (x)svcd's that have almost dvd quaility and if you didn't know, you really couldn't tell. tmpgenc is the best, it's all in the settings.



Question - SVCD from 23,976 DivX is snatchy... No.19631
Q  2002-04-22 10:47:02 ( ID:czcmr2bphg. )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

When I convert DivX (23,976 fps) to MPEG-2 (SVCD NTSC Film, standard settings), the picture quality is good, but movings are a little snatchy (AVI source is ok). Is there any reason for it (fps is the same)? Is there any solution? Thanks for any help.


techno  Home )  2002-04-22 11:20:11 ( ID:gye7n0apz7c )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Try to increase the frame rate to 25fps

Techno


gdj  2002-04-22 12:29:58 ( ID:lilcnhjltvk )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

>Try to increase the frame rate to 25fps
>
>Techno

Wow, just another great invention from Techno-thing : the new ntsc framerate
standard.


Techno  Home )  2002-04-22 12:53:48 ( ID:gye7n0apz7c )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

No harm trying, is there? Oh yeh, maybe for u cause u know nowt


M.Bastian  2002-04-22 19:10:00 ( ID:lh1udvptj1c )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

>No harm trying, is there?
So you didnt know what will happen.

Q: What were your settings? Did you use a Template? What did you change from that Template? Did this snatchyness occure after or bevore burning to an CD-R? Have you tried another Software Player? Have you another divx to check?
Please be as detailed as possible or all we can do is just guess ... and since im not good at guessing and dont want to waste someone elses time with false advice I cant respond.


M.Bastian  2002-04-22 19:26:09 ( ID:lh1udvptj1c )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Uhm ... im half guessing now *blushes* but as far as I know you have to set 2:3 pulldown under Settings -> Advanced if you you are encoding NTSC at 23 FPS.

From http://www.vcdhelp.com/tmpgencexplained.htm :
-----
3:2 pulldown when playback: This is used when you
have a FILM source movie (23.976fps) to leave it
23.976 but have your decoder play it back at
29.976fps.
-----

Im rather confident that this will solve your problem but the best bet is to find an short scene (10 seconds) with much of that snatchiness and try it out.


ASHY  2002-04-22 19:51:37 ( ID:4adzcnohuc. )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

>Try to increase the frame rate to 25fps
>
>Techno

What will happen is the movie will jerk even more and probably wont play in your DVD player without problems.

First of all is this happening on your PC or just your DVD player? If it's just your DVD player then M.Bastian is probably right as your DVD player is probably converting the frame rate to 29.976 fps NTSC standard. It happens on my DVD player when I have a movie that is NTSC 29.976 as I use the PAL system at 25 fps.
Use the 3:2 pulldown system and this should correct you problem.

ASHY



Free talk - Techno's statements are making this forum RIDICULOUS ! No.19607
gdj  2002-04-22 08:51:40 ( ID:lilcnhjltvk )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Just remove his postings.


techno  Home )  2002-04-22 08:52:46 ( ID:gye7n0apz7c )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Get a life, u should be banned.

You are jelous



gdj  2002-04-22 09:01:33 ( ID:lilcnhjltvk )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

"jelous" ?


SP  2002-04-22 09:28:37 ( ID:3klufuoi8pw )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

I agree with gdj.


Brad  2002-04-22 10:21:33 ( ID:lilcnhjltvk )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]


It's all in his name : NO-TECHnical background.


techno  Home )  2002-04-22 10:29:29 ( ID:gye7n0apz7c )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Ur all immature


techno  Home )  2002-04-22 10:29:54 ( ID:gye7n0apz7c )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

It's all in ur name "God Damn Jelous"


K  2002-04-22 11:42:26 ( ID:ddtbpozwbrm )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Please do not abuse others.

To be honest, I do not appreciate what Techno does because it is not helpful,
sometime completely wrong/inappropriate. It just increases number of
people who are just posting question without searching anything.

Well, I guess Techno is blocked at least once, since his IP has changed.
It was : 62.31.64.2
Now is : 195.194.47.252

I am looking forward to seeing that more IPs of Techno are blocked.
Let's see which IP Techno uses in next post.


M.Bastian  2002-04-22 12:03:15 ( ID:6rwujfqjepw )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Nope, I dont think his IP is blocked. Its just that he is posting his immature replys from his School.
See this page for email adresses of the Staff:
http://www.stevenson.ac.uk/prospective_staff/who_is_who.asp
I for myself will set up an email to the schools principal regarding his behaviour and abuse of an school account.


M.Bastian  2002-04-22 12:09:32 ( ID:6rwujfqjepw )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Typo in the mail fieled in the above posting. Its m_bastian@mx.net not gmx.de


M.Bastian  2002-04-22 12:19:32 ( ID:6rwujfqjepw )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

/bonks head against wall

grr typo day ...

Techno: Make an public excuse and in the future think twice what youre posting and all is fine. Either way I will not drop this topic this time. The damage you do to this Forum, the Programm and the newbys wasted time is to big to go unnoticed any longer.


Techno  Home )  2002-04-22 12:59:07 ( ID:gye7n0apz7c )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Were u talking about urself there?


Rck60s  2002-04-22 13:03:32 ( ID:xmskm5l1zim )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Pleasae explain to me what he has done that is inappropriate...He has helped me with his answers....I do not believe that I would have gotten as far with this program without his help...This program is frustrating to say the least without a manual...If someone thakes the time to help they should be thanked not kicked around..Pleas tell me what misinformation he has given and then maybe i will believe you.


M.Bastian  2002-04-22 13:16:42 ( ID:6rwujfqjepw )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Just to name a few:

http://www.tmpgenc.net/cgi-bin/ebbs/board.cgi?board=tmpgenc#topic4954
http://www.tmpgenc.net/cgi-bin/ebbs/board.cgi?board=tmpgenc&page=1#topic4914
http://www.tmpgenc.net/cgi-bin/ebbs/board.cgi?board=tmpgenc&cmd=topic&wparam=4182
http://www.tmpgenc.net/cgi-bin/ebbs/board.cgi?board=tmpgenc&cmd=topic&wparam=4273
http://www.tmpgenc.net/cgi-bin/ebbs/board.cgi?board=tmpgenc&cmd=topic&wparam=4321 (Technos flames were deleted)
http://www.tmpgenc.net/cgi-bin/ebbs/board.cgi?board=tmpgenc&cmd=topic&wparam=4222


Techno  Home )  2002-04-22 13:40:53 ( ID:gye7n0apz7c )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Say what u want, how will believe a person that stirs up trouble?


SP  2002-04-22 13:52:40 ( ID:d4a5wuxiwpr )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

I am going to have contact with certain people of Pegasys Inc. to stop Techno.
But this is not only for abusing/inaapropreate attitude in the BBS, but
also for copyright infringement.
I know Techno has made some cracks of TMPGEnc and TMPGEnc plus.


PS  2002-04-22 14:04:00 ( ID:3klufuoi8pw )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

The problem of Techno is

1. He has cracked TMPGEnc and distributed it.
This is completely against law.

2. He tries to reply/post every single topics, and does not provide appropriate answer, and he believes that he is helping.
But what he is doing is make newbies more lazy. Most questions Techno has answered is what people can search over the net.

I do not want make this place for such people those who just ask whatever they want to ask without searching by themselves before asking.

So I think Techno should leave this BBS or someone should stop him.


Techno  Home )  2002-04-22 14:05:48 ( ID:gye7n0apz7c )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

I think u should leave


Opt  2002-04-22 14:18:55 ( ID:ggonwbo953a )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

I think Techno(Ahmed Ilyas) should leave this BBS and drop out from school because of what he has done.


RX  2002-04-22 14:37:18 ( ID:d4a5wuxiwpr )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

I think we should talk to Stevenson College and Pegasys Inc. for this matter since I do not think Ahmed Ilyas listens people here.


willyiam  2002-04-22 14:48:01 ( ID:nsbkh5almbg )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Two question for Techno:

Do you have a registered version of TMPGEnc Plus?

You state in thread 4992 that you use LSX for MPEG-2. Is this because you feel that LSX is superior to TMPGEnc?

I await your response with eagerness.



GOOBER  2002-04-22 22:22:55 ( ID:w8yn5mktf8w )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

I dont think "Techno" is smart enough to develope a "crack" for "tmpgenc" because if he was he wouldn"t be here all the time, he would be out there with Einstein developeing his way of getting 3gb on a 80 min cd...


Bob  2002-04-23 01:56:20 ( ID:xgarobitszw )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

I have been seeing that Techno was offering crack of TMPGEnc and TMPGEnc Plus version from last year in this BBS!!!, although such posts were deleted!

Couple weeks ago, sherlock( IP:24.64.223.203 ) or GOOBER( IP:24.64.223.203 )
post Serial number of Nero, and it was Deleted.

These guys should leave this BBS or/and should be blocked or/and sued for copyright infringement!


Bin  2002-04-23 08:47:54 ( ID:nq/ghsrqtz2 )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

I hope this BBS blocks people who violated copyright in some way at least.

And I am hoping more people search information BEFORE they post question.



Question - LSX MPEG ENCODER No.19604
MannaZen1  Home )  2002-04-22 07:50:32 ( ID:bretwi1a3.g )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

What's everyone's opinion on LSX MPEG opposed to TMPGenc?


Techno  Home )  2002-04-22 07:52:28 ( ID:82zqdopxre6 )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

TMPGENC is far better! :)

Alot of features, more tools etc... Than LSX

I only use LSX for the MPEG2 codec so I can encode my files to MPEG2 and MPEG2 again etc...

Techno


sherlock  2002-04-22 21:37:51 ( ID:w8yn5mktf8w )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

LSX_ sucks the big one,the quality is awfull and the speed is like a snail race..it has got to be the worst encoder that was ever made..enough said



Question - VCD/SVCD Quality on TV No.19600
MannaZen1  Home )  2002-04-22 07:45:54 ( ID:bretwi1a3.g )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

I'm new at this, and was wondering what the quality of a burned VCD/ SVCD is like on a regular TV, as far as video/ audio quality go. Any specific settings for optimal outcome?
Also, when I go to burn a m2v file on NERO, which heading on the status bar should I use?
Thanks for any response


Techno  Home )  2002-04-22 07:51:32 ( ID:82zqdopxre6 )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

You should use MPEG2 for the status question

use vbv buffer of 224 as this will get rid of MOST blocks on the video if any

increase the brightness a tad

this is really about it! :)

Best of luck

Techno


M.Bastian  2002-04-22 09:03:56 ( ID:6rwujfqjepw )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

As I already proved in this thread playing around with VBV is utter nonsense
http://www.tmpgenc.net/cgi-bin/ebbs/board.cgi?board=tmpgenc#topic4954

The quality on TV is(subjectively)slightly better than played with most software players cause of the encoding hardwares more sophisticated filers. At least for me on my Yamakawa 715 compared to several player Programms under WinXP and Debian Linux


ASHY  2002-04-22 21:19:18 ( ID:4adzcnohuc. )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

The VBV buffer size does not for the millionth time have any effect on image quality whatsoever you goddam fool, but may give problems on a less than compatible DVD player.
Reason: The VBV buffer is to set the internal buffer size of the decoder.

Basically what happens is there is a space in a memory chip called the buffer which is sort of a like a small pipe (so to call it). This pipe needs to be filled with data from one side before the data comes out on the other. The size of the VBV buffer setting in TMPG determines the size of this pipe.
If the pipe is too big and the data being supplied to it is slow moving such as low bitrate VCD's then what will happen is the pipe (buffer) will not fill quick enough from the input side before the data is requested at the output side causing 'Buffer underflow'

When the decoder requests the video data at the output side then this data won't be there yet so your decoder has no information to supply to the DVD player to put on your screen. To compensate your decoder will just have to wait for the data to appear which will then look like jerky playback because it is always waiting for the data to catch up or your player will just freeze after a certain length of time and refuse to play the movie any further.

A similar thing would happen if its too small i.e small VBV buffer size and the data being supplied to it is high bitrate (such as DVD) then this information will be pushed into the pipe at a fast rate and the pipe will fill faster due to being smaller.
If the pipe fills up before the decoder is ready to take the data at the other end to be put on the screen by the DVD player then the pipe will begin to overflow (buffer overflow) which will cause the DVD player to have to drop frames to keep up with the data flow or may stop playing altogether.

This is the reason why it doesn't affect the actual picture quality and doesn't reduce macro blocks, but the actual picture stability. Macro blocks are what make up the image of a movie and are hard encoded into the movie and can't be removed, but can be made less evident by other decoding filters which which your DVD player uses.

I posted this because of Technos' constant advice of a 224 VBV buffersize which is to big for a standard VCD and is DVD standard. The MPEG standards state the best setting is 40 for standard VCD and should be plenty. I say standard because if you up the bitrate past about 1800kbps then the buffer size should be increased to about 112 and then past around 3500 increased to 224.

Who do you want to believe? The author of TMPGenc and the knowledge of respected experts or some jumped up school kid with a chip on his shoulder.

I hope you now understand why the buffer size Techno is stating could cause problems in your DVD player when playing VCD's.

ASHY



Question - can I speed up my avi when making an mpeg? No.19595
Joy  2002-04-22 05:53:27 ( ID:kqeswzcpkao )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Does anyone know if I can some how change the speed of my avi when I convert it to a mpeg? The avi that I have is real clear, but like in slow motion.


Techno  Home )  2002-04-22 07:50:31 ( ID:82zqdopxre6 )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

change the setting to motion search estimate (fast) and make sure your not doing anything while encoding.

Techno


ffast  2002-04-22 08:16:39 ( ID:rq73n1voqvj )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

> Does anyone know if I can some how change the speed of my avi when I convert > it to a mpeg? The avi that I have is real clear, but like in slow motion.

Was it originally slow? if so, There is no way to make it faster.

If the movie is not originally slow, and it became slow after the conversion
to MPEG, you have to check the setting/codecs you use, and make sure the AVI
can be played properly on your PC. Also depending on the file format and priority of codecs you are using, the result can be quite different.

BTW, I do not think what Techno says is solution for this matter.


ASHY  2002-04-22 22:05:36 ( ID:n3gjkhi6dvc )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

I agree with ffast techno's advice won't have any effect and if he had any idea what it does then he probably wouldn't have suggested it in the first place.
But I'm sorry to have to disagree with you on one point ffast.
You can change the speed of an AVI by simply downloading this program http://www.divx-digest.com/software/avifrate.html and changing the framerate of the movie which it does without re-encoding.
But be advised this will desync the audio. This can be remedied using cool edit 2000.

ASHY


Joy  2002-04-23 00:10:44 ( ID:lf8bomhf4rj )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Thanks you guy's for your help. Much appreciated. And,yes, this avi was slow like that when I downloaded it.



Question - JPEGS to MPEGs + Audio No.19594
Craig  2002-04-22 02:33:52 ( ID:sehui.9zuzr )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

I know how to export a image sequence but how do you import a imiage sequence ??
I know QT Pro can do it but can anyone help me out !!???



Question - Cutting File Size No.19592
Adam  2002-04-22 01:00:05 ( ID:eyyjidc5ovl )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Hi, I'm new to this, but I noticed that when I convert a long file, one that's about an hour and a half to two hours, it says it will take 1300 to 1400 MB. I noticed some of the other posts mention a way to make this 2 seperate files, so that you can put one on each CD. How do you make a large video file like that seperate so that the individual files can fit on CDs? Thanks a lot for your help.


TheOldMan  2002-04-22 06:46:08 ( ID:zcjfk3/l9kh )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

use TMPGEnc to convert then VCDEasy to cut and burn



Request - Watermarking an MPG No.19589
PB  2002-04-22 00:56:05 ( ID:dqvyjyyrubc )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

For a future release of TMPGEnc, it would be nice if it could let you specify
a short text message that would be encoded as part of the MPG, in one of the
four corners of the frame. :) Anyone else agree?


Techno  Home )  2002-04-22 07:52:47 ( ID:82zqdopxre6 )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

ideal! :)

Techno


Image Arson  2002-05-13 12:21:48 ( ID:0kpd6q4vihw )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

To add watermarks, simply use any supported image formatted created in Photoshop as an Alpha-Channel overlay in any standard video editor program before compressing to AVI and then convert to Mpeg. Or, superimpose the graphic over the source frames before compressing the Mpeg. Either way works quite well.



Question - Cutting File Size No.19584
Adam  2002-04-22 00:29:05 ( ID:eyyjidc5ovl )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Hi, I'm new to this, but I noticed that when I convert a long file, one that's about an hour and a half to two hours, it says it will take 1300 to 1400 MB. I noticed some of the other posts mention a way to make this 2 seperate files, so that you can put one on each CD. How do you make a large video file like that seperate so that the individual files can fit on CDs? Thanks a lot for your help.


Techno  Home )  2002-04-22 07:49:47 ( ID:82zqdopxre6 )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

You can use a marge and cut or something in the MPEG tools in the file menu.

It is simple, easy to use.

Techno


Adam  2002-04-22 19:38:50 ( ID:eyyjidc5ovl )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Thanks a lot man.


Techno  Home )  2002-04-22 19:47:49 ( ID:82zqdopxre6 )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

np


sherlock  2002-04-22 22:27:51 ( ID:w8yn5mktf8w )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

use the "source range" it is much more reliable that the "cut" feature.......



Question - ac3 sound on an avi No.19582
madns  2002-04-21 23:59:16 ( ID:whrqtudrlcm )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

hi i found this in the bbs:

Yes ac3 sound can't be opent in Tmpgenc but what I do is that I use Msgraph and render from mediafile option, then I just select wav dest filter and file write filter and the ac3 sound from a mpg or avi file will be extracted and unpacked to a WAV file that is 100% readable in tmpgenc (however it will take up some space though... maby 400-600mb)

Goto http://doom9.net and there should be a guide somewhere on how to use (and download) msgraph or under the Links goto purplemans site.

the problem is i can't find the page/link for it, could someone help me out ?


Techno  Home )  2002-04-22 07:53:41 ( ID:82zqdopxre6 )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

What to do is to use vob2audio to extract the ac3 to wav.

Look at my guide

www.technosoft2000.co.uk/divx

method 1

there is a little bit on this.

Techno



Question - Converting - Aftermath Problems No.19578
Burnproof  2002-04-21 23:42:25 ( ID:cdlxux6beih )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Hi,

I mainly wanted to use TMPG to bring my avi/divx etc movie-collection into my living-room, like most of us here i assume...YET

after using tmpg on a test movie it took me about 16hrs++ (with filters activated though) on a AMD2Gig+, 512DDR, GeForce4 Ti 4400 system!
-> this cant be right, isnt it?!

while typing another test file is running through this time without filters! approx. 1 hr it says. Is that normal time-wise?

BUT to address my ultimate newbie problem:

Why couldnt my (not that old) DVD player not read my first homemade VCD? I used Uleads Movie Maker to convert and burn the TMPG-output MPEG-1 movie, into a Ntsc Vcd file.
I cant believe that it`s taht cumbersome to burn a lil`VCD.

Thanks for detailed help in advance!


Techno  Home )  2002-04-22 07:48:54 ( ID:82zqdopxre6 )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

It depends what filters you used.

What quality settings did u use? high quality/very high quality?

Techno


Gideon  Home )  2002-04-22 16:30:44 ( ID:gk/qdyj6oo6 )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

I found, that if you use 16:9 output isn't compatible for all
>DVD / SVCD / VCD players

If you didn't do that, it could be you have a CD-R problem, maybe you need coated CD's.

Else ... I don't know, centaily when you used the standards of TMPGenc, which are basically appliable for all DVD-players, I really don't get it.

> BUT (again but :D )

As I always say, you've got to try and experiment a lot, be4 you get the feeling of what's right, wrong and capable. I have been experimenting over the last 6 months now and I still have 1 more thing to do be4 I can say:

>There's nothing left to experiment anymore
(subtitles, SVCD's, VCD's, X(S)VCD's & miniDVD R mine :D except for AC3 :'( )

so for now, happy testing, put the "Settings -> Video -> Aspect Ratio" on 4:3 and adjust the movie by cropping it.

>TIP: Don't do this to an VCD, cuz it's low resolution and it WON'T look as
>pretty as SVCD with cropping / letterboxing.

ADIOS and happy learning

Gideon


Burnproof  2002-04-22 19:54:30 ( ID:cdlxux6beih )   [ Delete / Reply with quotation ]

Hi guys, thx for such good feedback on my FAQs.

I hafta admit, that I really did a rush job (ignore the 16hrs waiting time:) when i first used TMPG!
I`m glad on the other hand that I found such a friendly and prof. forum to cover with potential sorrows...lol.

I will definetly indulge myself with further, thorough experiments from this time on, where I will consider the valuable points given by you!

Let`s conquer this chapter asap as well...

Cheers again, k?!

`til soon.



TMPGEnc 2.5 (Free or plus version) BBS [ Sorted by thread creation date ] << < Prev.   [ 616 / 680 ]   Next > >>

View article | Back to TMPGEnc Home | Administrator TMPGEnc Net

Script written by TMPGEnc.