This forum is for users to exchange information and discuss with other users about a TMPGEnc product.
In case you need official support, please contact TMPG Inc.
Pegasys Products BBS [ Sorted by thread creation date ]
Number the files in sequence like file001.asf, file002.asf, file003.asf and so on then enable the 'Open sequence files as a movie' option in the general tab in 'Enviromental settings'
Then just load the first file of the sequence.
Exactly. I tried encoding a 90 min 1400MB file to WM9 700K total bitrate and got the estimated file size of 1.59MB. Shame to as this is exactly what I want to use for my WM9 encodes. Maybe next year when the developers learn how to code calculations correctly.
Why? you can set a clean start and stop encode point using twice the same source file ? 2.5 cut tool screwed more filers than I can count, this is why I always used the Source range filter in 2.5 and now the list in XPress.
Keep 2.5 plus Installed, There are some things that just should change I have both installed. I find that 2.5 is better for simple things that 3.0xp is not.
When searching for VFAPI in the english helpfile, I found a vocab list that was still in japanese. Maybe there are other parts that are also still untranslated, but I didn't see any other.
During the Helper compilation we mistakenly left a Japanese file in place. We are sorry for the inconvenience it provocs and are building a new Helper file we guaranty in full plain English. Other files are not affected by this problem.
The correction will be available with the next TMPGEnc 3.0 XPress update.
Any comments or suggestions regarding the Help file are welcome.
The number of frames reported when using the internal MPEG file reader is 40-50 times higher than it should be. Tested with different streams with the same result.
If I disable the internal and enable Cyberlink's decoder in the VFAPI options (I have powerdvd installed) I get the right number of frames.
Also when loading the .m2v with the internal reader it was unable to detect that the stream was 16:9, so I had to change that manually.
In 2.5 there were no problems reading YV12 data from avisynth when I had DivX installed (since it registers itself as handling YV12 decoding), but in 3.0, I have to convert to YUY2 or RGB before opening.
Please look into this or explain why it is not supported any more.
That's a problem with your Priority-Settings in TMPGEnc. YV12-Input via AVIsynth is working.
But it is always a very bad Idea to do that. Converting to RGB24 in AVISynth is a lot better and fast than doing than by an extra Codec.
One feature that I used a lot in 2.5 and earlier was the ability to manually perform inverse telecine and/or manually override the automatic option. The automatic ivtc seems to have been improved in 3.0, but it's still not perfect and I really want the ability to do all this in tmpg.
I'm really sad to see that this option have disappeared in 3.0, but the new features were still enough for me to buy it.
Well. When I convert an AVI to an MPEG, I want to be able to play it on a DVD player for my TV. But the AVI is a widescreen, and when I converted it and burned it it played the MPEG on the DVD player. But the movie was up at the top of the screen and the right side was cut off, and there was some blue line stuff at the bottom of the screen.
How do I convert the AVI to an MPEG that gets played in the center with black spaces at the top and the bottom like a regular widescreen DVD?
One week after lauching TMPGEnc 3.0 XPress and opening this BBS we are not really surprized by the reaction of the trial users, we have just expected more comprehension regarding the software and the validation system. You will find below an answer to most of your questions. For you convenience the text is cut in several parts.
Other problems related to our software or services may happend. In advance we present all our sincere apologies and do our best to avoid such problems to occur again.
TMPGenc.net
- Why a validation system -
Pegasys Inc. decided to implement the validation system for multiple reasons. The first of them is based on the assertion somewhat logical a User benefits of the services he/she pays for. Software, like the TMPEnc series, is not a material object but a service provided through different media such as Internet or CD-ROM. We call service all the knowledge and know-how contained in the software and the support, update, counselling we provide.
We legitimately expect from the person using our services to possess the right to do so in the same manner this person expects from us the service is provided in good condition. Some parts of the service are limited in time, but as long as all or part of the service is used, a User has to justify this right.
We have been disappointed to find how much our software were (and are) used by persons who had never and will never pay the price of all the necessary efforts and sacrifices we provide. Some of you may think we consider all users as potential pirates. Far from this thought we consider the validation system is the only way to build a balanced relation between Pegasys Inc and its Users. The obligations born by both parties are now clear and equal, and therefore benefit for all without exception.
you need to build a better validation system, you will not succeeed with weekly license validation.
Does Windows XP need weekly or monthly or yearly validation, NO
Does Office XP need weekly or monthly or yearly validation, NO
Does Speedd Razor need weekly or monthly or yearly validation, NO
Does FilmFX need weekly or monthly or yearly validation, NO
I could go on for a few pages......
I TOTALLY AGREE to ipmplement something to stamp out pirates, but not this way, I do not like to have an Internet connection on my edit systems, you of all should know why
In addition to what others already pointed out:
Software companies go bancrupt, are bought out, or are hindered in sellig their products due to legal disputes frequently. I certainly do not wish this to you, but it happens every day.
What do you expect your customers to do in such a case? Throw the software into the trash can and start their running projects from scratch? This is definitely *NOT* an option.
If you don't want to scare away your customers, you have to re-work the license verification system in at least two aspects:
- Once activated, the software must stay usable as-is for an unlimited time period to make sure customers won't loose their investments. Re-activation is acceptable when updating, though.
- There has to be a manual alternative to online activation, e.g. by exchanging activation data by email. Even temporary internet connections bear a high risk when there's no way to check what information is actually transmitted. Some customers might also not be able to modify their firewall settings, because these are controlled company-wide by the IT department.
I don't mind the way the software and activation works today, but I agree that there should be an optional way of activating.
A message that you can send over email would work for those that don't want to connect directly to internet, or in other cases where they simply can't use direct connection.
Sad to see that so many users instantly start complaining without actually coming with constructive criticism :/